Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935160›Full record

ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2025

Rationalising blood tests in a resource-limited emergency unit: A quality improvement project.

Renette Esterhuizen, Lilani I Tribelhorn, Danielle M J Thomas, Eugenne Elliott, Talat Habib, Arun Nair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renette EsterhuizenNorthern Cape Department of Health, Faculty of Family Medicine, Robert Mangaliso Sobukwe Hospital, Kimberley. esterhuizen.renette@gmail.com.
Lilani I Tribelhorn
Danielle M J Thomas
Eugenne Elliott
Talat Habib
Arun Nair

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn resource-limited emergency settings, blood testing is crucial for diagnostics but can lead to financial strain and diagnostic challenges if used indiscriminately. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to identify commonly requested blood tests in an emergency department (ED), assess their appropriateness, and establish evidence-based guidelines for judicious use. This project was conducted during the family medicine rotation of interns at a tertiary hospital in a semi-urban area.

methodsThe Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) method was employed. Pre- and post-intervention data were collected. An educational intervention, featuring informative visual aids was implemented to help guide the medical practitioners in the unit on appropriate blood test ordering.

resultsThe intervention led to a significant 48.7% reduction in total daily blood tests ordered, with a notable decrease in full-panel requests and an increase in individual test ordering.

conclusionEducational interventions, aimed at guiding blood test requests, can significantly reduce unnecessary testing. Long-term data collection is necessary to confirm sustained changes in practice.Contribution: Our findings indicate that clear, evidence-based guidelines for the judicious use of blood tests can positively impact test ordering, particularly in resource-limited settings, and suggest opportunities for further long-term studies.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHematologic TestsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality ImprovementUnnecessary ProceduresHealth ResourcesHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicTertiary Care Centersblood testsemergency unitevidence-based guidelinesquality improvementresource utilisation

Identifiers

PMID39935160
PMCPMC11886463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.