ArticleEuropean heart journal2025
Suspected de novo heart failure in outpatient care: the REVOLUTION HF study.
Article in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natriuretic Peptides as Multisystem Regulators: From Clinical Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets in Cardio-immunology.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Worse long-term outcomes in new-onset HFpEF vs HFrEF and HFmrEF: findings from the Stockholm PREFERS study.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Unexpected therapeutic scenarios: initiating SGLT2 inhibitors in de novo heart failure without echocardiography.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Heart failure in 2025: new insights, therapies, and clinical directions.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Established and emerging pharmacologic options and unmet needs in HFpEF and HFmrEF.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Advances in the Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.International journal of heart failure · 2026Review
- Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Use in Contemporary Heart Failure Care.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- A heart failure network model to improve outcome and trans-sectoral guideline-directed medical treatment utilization.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Raising the Bar: Age-adjust NT-proBNP to improve specificity and reduce delay.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Inflammasomes as Potential Therapeutic Targets to Prevent Chronic Active Viral Myocarditis-Translating Basic Science into Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsAmbulatory patients presenting with signs or symptoms of heart failure (HF) should undergo natriuretic peptide testing. Rates of death, HF hospitalization, and healthcare costs were examined in patients thus identified with suspected de novo HF.
methodsThis population-based study (REVOLUTION HF) encompassing two large healthcare regions in Sweden examined patients who presented to outpatient care for the first time between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020, who had a recorded sign (peripheral oedema) or symptom (dyspnoea) of HF, and whose N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measured >300 ng/L within ±30 days of that sign or symptom. Characteristics, outcomes, healthcare patterns, and healthcare costs for these patients were followed for 1 year. Comparisons were made with matched controls without history of HF, its signs, its symptoms, or elevated NT-proBNP.
resultsOverall, 5942 patients (median age 78.7 years; 54% women) presented with suspected de novo HF. Within 1 year, 29% had received a HF diagnosis. Patients with suspected de novo HF had higher rates of all-cause death (11.7 vs. 6.5 events/100 person-years) and HF hospitalizations (12.5 vs. 2.2 events/100 person-years) than matched controls (n = 2048), with the highest event rates in the weeks after presentation. Rates were higher with higher NT-proBNP levels. Although some patients already used HF guideline-directed medical therapies for other indications, initiation of new medications was variable. Healthcare costs were higher in patients with suspected de novo HF than in matched controls, driven mostly by HF and chronic kidney disease.
conclusionsPatients with suspected HF and elevated NT-proBNP had high mortality and morbidity in the weeks after presentation, and accrued substantial healthcare costs, highlighting an urgent need for prompt identification, evaluation, and treatment of HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.