ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Comparative Efficacy of 3D-Printed Insoles in Managing Common Foot Conditions: A Review.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Enhanced Modular Material Selection for Patient-Specific Diabetic Insoles via Silicone Molding.Human factors · 2026Article
- 3D-Printed Plantar Orthoses and the Conditional Viability of Recycled PLA.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical orthotic insoles are commonly used to support the ankle and foot while standing and walking to enhance gait mechanics and reduce foot discomfort. Medical orthotic insoles are especially effective in addressing congenital or acquired orthopedic issues and degenerative diseases. Among the various therapeutic options, three-dimensional (3D)-printed insoles have emerged as a promising alternative due to their potential for customization and improved performance compared to traditional insoles. This review investigated the effectiveness of 3D-printed insoles in managing 3 common foot conditions: flexible flatfoot, diabetic foot ulcers, and plantar fasciitis. A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases. Studies comparing traditional insoles or barefoot conditions with 3D-printed insoles were included; 4 studies met the eligibility criteria. The findings revealed that patients with flexible flatfoot, diabetic foot ulcers, and plantar fasciitis reported greater comfort with 3D-printed insoles compared to traditional insoles. Additionally, 3D-printed insoles provided more effective pressure relief in affected foot areas. These results highlight the therapeutic potential of 3D-printed insoles in improving foot health and gait efficiency. 3D printing technology has the potential to revolutionize the manufacturing of medical orthotic insoles by enabling personalized, efficient, and data-driven treatments. However, practical challenges, including high costs, material limitations, and the need for specialized expertise and regulatory frameworks, must be addressed to facilitate its widespread adoption. This review aimed to analyze the role of 3D printing in manufacturing medical orthotic insoles, focusing on its therapeutic potential and the need for further research to validate its efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.