Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39935008›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

Enhancing Surgery Scheduling in Health Care Settings With Metaheuristic Optimization Models: Algorithm Validation Study.

João Lopes, Tiago Guimarães, Júlio Duarte, Manuel Santos

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

João LopesALGORITMI Research Centre, University of Minho, Rua da Universidade, Braga, 4800-058, Portugal, 351 934373667.ORCID 0000-0001-7854-8293
Tiago GuimarãesALGORITMI Research Centre, University of Minho, Rua da Universidade, Braga, 4800-058, Portugal, 351 934373667.ORCID 0000-0001-6320-8878
Júlio DuarteALGORITMI Research Centre, University of Minho, Rua da Universidade, Braga, 4800-058, Portugal, 351 934373667.ORCID 0000-0002-5458-3390
Manuel SantosALGORITMI Research Centre, University of Minho, Rua da Universidade, Braga, 4800-058, Portugal, 351 934373667.ORCID 0000-0002-5441-3316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health care is facing many challenges. The recent pandemic has caused a global reflection on how clinical and organizational processes should be organized, which requires the optimization of decision-making among managers and health care professionals to deliver care that is increasingly patient-centered. The efficiency of surgical scheduling is particularly critical, as it affects waiting list management and is susceptible to suboptimal decisions due to its complexity and constraints. Objective: In this study, in collaboration with one of the leading hospitals in Portugal, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Santo António (CHUdSA), a heuristic approach is proposed to optimize the management of the surgical center. Methods: CHUdSA's surgical scheduling process was analyzed over a specific period. By testing an optimization approach, the research team was able to prove the potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-based heuristic models in minimizing scheduling penalties-the financial costs incurred by procedures that were not scheduled on time. Results: The application of this approach demonstrated potential for significant improvements in scheduling efficiency. Notably, the implementation of the hill climbing (HC) and simulated annealing (SA) algorithms stood out in this implementation and minimized the scheduling penalty, scheduling 96.7% (415/429) and 84.4% (362/429) of surgeries, respectively. For the HC algorithm, the penalty score was 0 in the urology, obesity, and pediatric plastic surgery medical specialties. For the SA algorithm, the penalty score was 5100 in urology, 1240 in obesity, and 30 in pediatric plastic surgery. Together, this highlighted the ability of AI-heuristics to optimize the efficiency of this process and allowed for the scheduling of surgeries at closer dates compared to the manual method used by hospital professionals. Conclusions: Integrating these solutions into the surgical scheduling process increases efficiency and reduces costs. The practical implications are significant. By implementing these AI-driven strategies, hospitals can minimize patient wait times, maximize resource use, and enhance surgical outcomes through improved planning. This development highlights how AI algorithms can effectively adapt to changing health care environments, having a transformative impact.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAppointments and SchedulesEfficiency, OrganizationalArtificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareHumansPortugalartificial intelligencehealth caremetaheuristic modelmodel optimizationsurgery schedulingsurgery scheduling problem

Identifiers

PMID39935008
PMCPMC11840878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.