Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934900›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Populist attitudes and belief in conspiracy theories: anti-elitist attitudes and the preference for unrestricted popular sovereignty reduce the positive impact of an analytical thinking style on conspiracy beliefs.

Stephanie Mehl, Winfried Rief, Daniel Soll, Nico Pytlik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie MehlDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy & Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (MCMBB), Philipps University, Rudolf-Bultmann-Str. 8, 35039, Marburg, Germany. Stephanie.mehl@staff.uni-marburg.de.
Winfried RiefDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35037, Marburg, Germany.
Daniel SollDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy & Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (MCMBB), Philipps University, Rudolf-Bultmann-Str. 8, 35039, Marburg, Germany.
Nico PytlikDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35037, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePopulist attitudes and the tendency to believe in specific conspiracy theories (conspiracy beliefs) are often exploited by extremist or populist parties. However, more scientific research is needed to scrutinize this association. Consequently, the present non-preregistered exploratory online study assessed whether and how conspiracy beliefs and populist attitudes are associated and whether populist attitudes moderate the association between the preference for an analytical or intuitive thinking style and conspiracy beliefs.

resultsWe assessed 483 nonclinical individuals regarding their conspiracy beliefs, populist attitudes, and thinking styles and found a moderate correlation between populist attitudes and conspiracy beliefs. Conspiracy beliefs were significantly predicted by three facets of populist attitudes (anti-elitism, preference for unrestricted popular sovereignty, and belief in the homogeneity and virtuousness of the people). Anti-elitist attitudes and a preference for unrestricted popular sovereignty significantly moderated (reduced) the impact of an analytical thinking style on conspiracy beliefs. Anti-elitism and a preference for popular sovereignty might enhance a person's vulnerability to conspiracy beliefs. We assume that these populistic attitudes reduce a person's motivation to use a more effortful thinking style to reinterpret ideology-inconsistent information to protect existing conspiracy beliefs. Our results provide new insights into the interplay between conspiracy beliefs, populism, and a preference for an analytical/more effortful thinking style.

Indexed as

AttitudePoliticsThinkingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAnalytical thinking styleAnti-elitismConspiracy beliefsPopulismPreference for popular sovereignty

Identifiers

PMID39934900
PMCPMC11817401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.