Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934895›Full record

ReviewGenomics & informatics2025

Epigenetic regulation of angiogenesis and its therapeutics.

Dong Kyu Choi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genomics & informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Angiogenesis, Angiogenic Factors, and Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS).International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dong Kyu ChoiBK21 FOUR KNU Creative BioResearch Group, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. dongkyu@knu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from preexisting ones, is essential for normal development, wound healing, and tissue repair. However, dysregulated angiogenesis is implicated in various pathological conditions, including cancer, diabetic retinopathy, and atherosclerosis. Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modification, and noncoding RNAs (e.g., miRNAs), play a crucial role in regulating angiogenic gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence. These modifications tightly regulate the balance between pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors, thereby influencing endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and tube formation. In recent years, epigenetic drugs, such as DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (e.g., azacitidine, decitabine), histone deacetylase inhibitors (e.g., vorinostat, romidepsin), and BET inhibitors (e.g., JQ1), have emerged as promising therapeutic strategies for targeting abnormal angiogenesis. These agents modulate gene expression patterns, reactivating silenced tumor suppressor genes while downregulating pro-angiogenic signaling pathways. Additionally, miRNA modulators, such as MRG-110 and MRG-201, provide precise regulation of angiogenesis-related pathways, demonstrating significant therapeutic potential in preclinical models. This review underscores the intricate interplay between epigenetic regulation and angiogenesis, highlighting key mechanisms and therapeutic applications. Advancing our understanding of these processes will enable the development of more effective and targeted epigenetic therapies for angiogenesis-related diseases, paving the way for innovative clinical interventions.

Indexed as

AngiogenesisEpigenetic drugsEpigenetic modification

Identifiers

PMID39934895
PMCPMC11817428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.