Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934872›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025

Antimicrobial stewardship in the community setting: a qualitative exploratory study.

Rose I Okonkwo, Henry Ndukwe, Gary Grant, Sohil Khan

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rose I OkonkwoSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. rose.okonkwo@griffithuni.edu.au.
Henry NdukweSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Gary GrantSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Sohil KhanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. s.khan@griffith.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting evidence underscores inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing and use in the community setting. Increased and inappropriate antimicrobial use are major factors contributing to the emergence and transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes are critical for mitigating AMR, enhancing patient outcomes, and reducing healthcare costs. Despite the existing Australian National Action Plan on AMR, optimisation of antimicrobial use in the community setting remains inadequately investigated. This study explored health professionals' perspectives on community AMS practices and systems, identifying challenges and areas for improvement.

methodsThis qualitative study utilised semi-structured interviews to explore the perspectives of 17 different health professionals from diverse community practice settings in South-East Queensland, Australia. Interviews were audio-recorded, anonymised, and transcribed verbatim. Data were thematically analysed, with NVivo 12 utilised for organisation and analysis. Data were then mapped and examined using the Elements of Medicines Stewardship (EMS), which aligns with United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship. This was reported following the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research checklist.

resultsFour main themes described the health professionals' insights on community AMS practices and systems. Thematic analysis from these findings reveals a state of ambiguity and fragmentation in the community AMS practices and systems. In comparison to the hospital-based AMS system, the Australian community AMS system appears to be in its nascent stages of development. Applying the EMS is essential for developing and implementing community AMS strategies to enhance practices and systems.

conclusionThe study identified key health system factors that impact the implementation of community AMS programmes and highlighted the need for developing community-specific governance and frameworks that integrate multidisciplinary strategies to support effective implementation and enhance patient outcomes. This research will inform community AMS intervention strategies, influencing policy and practice to advance sustainable healthcare and address antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchQueenslandAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic stewardshipAntimicrobial prescribingAntimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobial stewardshipCommunity AMSCommunity settingHealth system

Identifiers

PMID39934872
PMCPMC11816747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.