ArticleBMC medicine2025
Modifiable factors and 10-year and lifetime cardiovascular disease risk in adults with new-onset hypertension: insights from the Kailuan cohort.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions of ischaemic heart disease risk among Indian migrants in Australia: a qualitative study.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- Association of life's essential 8 with pulmonary function impairment: a cross-sectional analysis of the Kailuan study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Stress, Anxiety, and Self-Efficacy in Hypertension: Evidence from a Romanian Case-Control Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of comorbidities among hypertensive patients in Northwest Ethiopia, 2024.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Multiple Risk Factors Controlled and Mortality Risks in Chronic Kidney Disease.Kidney & blood pressure research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreventing cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults with hypertension is essential, but it remains uncertain whether optimizing modifiable factors can eliminate the excess CVD risk associated with new-onset hypertension.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, 29,597 adults with new-onset hypertension and no prior CVD (from 2006-2016 surveys) were each matched by age and sex to a normotensive control. Eight modifiable factors were assessed using the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 algorithm. We followed participants for incident CVD until December 2020, estimating 10-year and lifetime (age 25-95) CVD risks using the Fine-Gray competing risks model.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 9.81 years, adults with new-onset hypertension had higher 10-year (8.97% vs. 6.31%) and lifetime CVD risks (45.55% vs. 34.98%) compared to normotensive controls. After adjusting for age, sex, and other unmodifiable factors, each additional favorable factor was associated with a stepwise reduction in CVD risk (P-trend < 0.05). Hypertensive participants with four or more favorable factors had a 17% lower 10-year CVD risk (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.97) and a similar lifetime CVD risk (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.78-1.05) compared to normotensive controls. Notably, the protective effect was weaker among those with early-onset (before age 45) hypertension than those with later-onset (age ≥ 60) hypertension (P-interaction < 0.05).
conclusionsIn adults with new-onset hypertension, maintaining four or more modifiable factors at favorable levels was associated with a CVD risk comparable to that of normotensive individuals. However, young hypertensive adults may require more aggressive interventions to mitigate CVD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.