ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Radiomics integration based on intratumoral and peritumoral computed tomography improves the diagnostic efficiency of invasiveness in patients with pure ground-glass nodules: a machine learning, cross-sectional, bicentric study.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting the invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma using intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRadiomics has shown promise in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer. Here, we investigated the performance of computed tomography-based radiomic features, extracted from gross tumor volume (GTV), peritumoral volume (PTV), and GTV + PTV (GPTV), for predicting the pathological invasiveness of pure ground-glass nodules present in lung adenocarcinoma.
methodsThis was a retrospective, cross-sectional, bicentric study with data collected from January 1, 2018, to June 1, 2022. We divided the dataset into a training cohort (n = 88) from one center and an external validation cohort (n = 59) from another center. Radiomic signatures (rad-scores) were obtained after features were selected through correlation and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis. Three machine learning models, a support vector machine model, a random forest model, and a generalized linear model, were then applied to build radiomic models.
resultsInvasive adenocarcinoma had a higher rad-score (P<0.001) in the GTV and GPTV. The area under the curves (AUC) of GTV, PTV, and GPTV were 0.839, 0.809, and 0.855 in the training cohort and 0.755, 0.777, and 0.801 in the external validation cohort, respectively. The GPTV model had higher AUCs for predicting pathological invasiveness. The random forest model had the best validity and fit for the proposed machine learning approach, suggesting that it may be the most appropriate model.
conclusionsGPTV had the highest diagnostic efficiency for predicting pathological invasiveness in patients with pure ground-grass nodules, and the random forest model outperformed other predictive models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.