ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
A novel method for screening malignant hematological diseases by constructing an optimal machine learning model based on blood cell parameters.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A complete blood count-based machine learning model for rapid differentiation of aplastic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia, and myelodysplastic syndromes in routine clinical practice.Practical laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Development and application of machine learning models for hematological disease diagnosis using routine laboratory parameters: a user-friendly diagnostic platform.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScreening of malignant hematological diseases is of great importance for their diagnosis and subsequent treatment. This study constructed an optimal screening model for malignant hematological diseases based on routine blood cell parameters.
methodsThe venous blood samples of 1751 patients collected from 10 tertiary hospitals in China were divided into a training set (1223 cases) and a validation set (528 cases). In addition to the clinical diagnostic information of the samples in the training set, 26 blood cell parameters including morphological parameters were selected using manual screening and filtering to construct eight machine learning models. These models were used to identify hematological malignancies among the validation set.
resultsComparison of the discrimination, calibration and clinical detection performance of the eight machine learning models revealed that the artificial neural network (ANN) model performed the optimal in identifying malignant haematological diseases in the validation set (528 cases), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of 0.906, 0.857, 0.832 and 0.884, respectively.
conclusionThe ANN model constructed can be used for screening of malignant hematological diseases, especially in primary hospitals that lack comprehensive diagnosis, and this ANN model will help patients to get diagnosis and treatment of malignant hematological diseases as early as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.