ArticleBMC biology2025
Species-specific blood-brain barrier permeability in amphibians.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a semipermeable interface that prevents the non-selective transport into the central nervous system. It controls the delivery of macromolecules fueling the brain metabolism and the immunological surveillance. The BBB permeability is locally regulated depending on the physiological requirements, maintaining the tissue homeostasis and influencing pathological conditions. Given its relevance in vertebrate CNS, it is surprising that little is known about the BBB in Amphibians, some of which are capable of adult CNS regeneration.
resultsThe BBB size threshold of the anuran Xenopus laevis (African clawed toad), as well as two urodele species, Ambystoma mexicanum (axolotl) and Pleurodeles waltl (Iberian ribbed newt), was evaluated under physiological conditions through the use of synthetic tracers. We detected important differences between the analyzed species. Xenopus exhibited a BBB with characteristics more similar to those observed in mammals, whereas the BBB of axolotl was found to be permeable to the 1 kDa tracer. The permeability of the 1 kDa tracer measured in Pleurodeles showed values in between axolotl and Xenopus vesseks. We confirmed that these differences are species-specific and not related to metamorphosis. In line with these results, the tight junction protein Claudin-5 was absent in axolotl, intermediate in Pleurodeles and showed full-coverage in Xenopus vessels. Interestingly, electron microscopy analysis and the retention pattern of the larger tracers (3 and 70 kDa) demonstrated that axolotl endothelial cells exhibit higher rates of macropinocytosis, a non-regulated type of transcellular transport.
conclusionsOur study demonstrated that, under physiological conditions, the blood-brain barrier exhibited species-specific variations, including permeability threshold, blood vessel coverage, and macropinocytosis rate. Future studies are needed to test whether the higher permeability observed in salamanders could have metabolic and immunological consequences contributing to their remarkable regenerative capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.