SynthesisBMC urology2025
Efficacy of curative radiotherapy for the treatment of elderly patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: real-world evidence from the MINOTAURO study.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Real-world Impact of Integrating Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment into Clinical Treatment Decision-making for Older Patients with Bladder Cancer.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Circadian Rhythm Genes-based Prognostic Signature for Bladder Cancer: Association of EZH2 Expression with Anesthetic-related Changes in Circulating Tumor Cells.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- A log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS)-based nomogram for survival prediction in elderly bladder cancer patients after radical cystectomy: development and validation using SEER and Chinese cohorts.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn recent years, a chemoradiotherapy has been developed as a radical treatment for stage II-III muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) that can preserve the bladder for patients who cannot tolerate radical cystectomy (RC) or who do not wish to undergo RC. However, most of the studies were conducted on younger patients with MIBC, and it is not clear if it is effective for elderly patients with MIBC. In this study, we reviewed the effects and adverse events after radical radiotherapy in elderly patients with MIBC to determine if radiotherapy has been/can be equally recommended for younger patients with MIBC.
methodsWe extracted full research reports in English comparing treatment results between different age groups and reports targeting elderly patients with MIBC. A keyword search of the PubMed database was conducted in the decade ending on December 8, 2021. Studies reporting post-treatment overall survival (OS), relapse-free/progression-free/disease-free survival (RFS/PFS/DFS), disease-specific/cancer-specific survival (DSS/CSS), and complete response (CR) rate, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients with MIBC were searched. Thirty-nine full articles, including those with comparisons by age group or treatments for elderly patients, were retrieved.
resultsOS was significant or tended to be poor in elderly patients. There were no differences in PFS and CSS between younger and elderly patients. No differences in the rates of grade 3 morbidities between younger and elderly patients were also observed.
conclusionThe lack of a difference in PFS/CSS and toxicities between elderly and younger MIBC patients indicated that curative chemoradiotherapy is effective for not only younger but also elderly patients. With advances in treatment, further prospective studies are needed to optimize the management of MIBC in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.