Observational studyBMC neurology2025
Exploring the effectiveness of high-flow nasal cannula in the neurointensive care unit: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of High flow nasal cannula in managing Type I respiratory failure in patients with neuromuscular disorders.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory failure is common occurrence in critical care, with varying causes, depending on case mix of the ICU. High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is commonly utilized in both adult and pediatric population. However, traditionally, neurologically ill patients have been considered unsuitable for HFNC due to poor sensorium and risk of aspiration. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the effectiveness of HFNC in Neuro ICU. METHODOLOGY: We did a prospective observational study on all adult patients requiring HFNC during their stay in Neuro ICU. Primary aim of the study was to find common indications for use of HFNC in neuro ICU. The secondary objective was to observe if HFNC could prevent re-intubation. The various other factors studied included age, gender, diagnosis (traumatic brain injury, postoperative neurosurgical condition or other neurological conditions), GCS score, HFNC settings, duration and cost of HFNC therapy.
resultsDuring the period from January 1, 2021- 23, out of 1825 patients admitted to neuro ICU, 98 required HFNC therapy. Mean age was 43.3 years (range 18-85), 75.5% of which were males. Utilization rate of HFNC was 5.3%. HFNC was more commonly used for non-trauma patients, most often to reduce work of breathing following extubation (85%). HFNC helped prevent the need for re-intubation in 76.5% of patients with a failure rate of 23.5% across all subgroups of patients in neuro ICU. Requirements for higher flow rate and FiO
conclusionIn neurocritical care, the causes of extubation failures and hypoxemia, differ significantly from other ICUs. In our study, HFNC was used most often to reduce work of breathing following extubation and was useful in preventing re-intubation. The use of HFNC did not significantly increase the cost of healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.