Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934718›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Machine learning approaches for predicting fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy: a retrospective study in China.

Qingyuan Liu, Simin Zhu, Meng Zhao, Lan Ma, Chenqian Wang, Xiaotong Sun, Yanyan Feng, Yifan Wu, Zhen Zeng, Lei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qingyuan Liu *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Simin Zhu *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Meng ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Lan MaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Chenqian WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Xiaotong SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yanyan FengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yifan WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhen ZengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. zza02617@btch.edu.cn.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. drzl@tsinghua.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubation Program px2022039National Natural Science Foundation of China 61927819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMacrosomia presents significant risks to both maternal and neonatal health, however, accurate antenatal prediction remains a major challenge. This study aimed to develop machine learning approaches to enhance the prediction of fetal macrosomia at different stages of pregnancy.

methodsThis retrospective study involved 500 pregnant women who delivered singleton infants at Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital between December 2019 and July 2024. The training set comprised 208 cases of macrosomia and 208 non-macrosomia cases, with 84 additional cases used for external validation. A total of 23 candidate variables, including maternal characteristics, physical measurements, and laboratory tests were collected for feature selection. Seven algorithms were applied in combination with three sets of selected features, resulting in 21 fitted models. Model performance was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score.

resultsMaternal height, pre-pregnancy weight, first-trimester weight, pre-labor weight, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain, and the proportion of male neonates were significantly greater in the macrosomia group compared to non-macrosomia group in the training set (p < 0.05). The top five predictors for macrosomia were pre-labor weight, gestational weight gain, the Pre-labor Hb/First-trimester Hb ratio, first-trimester Hb, and maternal height. Logistic regression yielded the highest AUC values in the pre-pregnancy (0.790) and first-trimester (0.815) periods in the validation set, whereas the ensemble model achieved the highest AUC value of 0.930 before labor. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis highlighted pre-labor weight, gestational age, gestational weight gain, first-trimester Hb, and neonatal sex as important factors for the prediction of macrosomia.

conclusionThis is the first study to utilize machine learning with data from the pre-pregnancy, first-trimester, and pre-labor periods to predict macrosomia. The logistic regression model and the final ensemble model demonstrated strong predictive performance, offering valuable insights to improve pre-pregnancy counseling, antenatal assessment, and intrapartum decision-making.

Indexed as

Fetal MacrosomiaMachine LearningAdultChinaFemaleGestational AgeGestational Weight GainHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBirth weightMachine learningMacrosomiaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39934718
PMCPMC11817776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.