Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934708›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Impact of radiation dose to immune cells on survival in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective analysis.

Junfeng Zhao, Kang Wang, Ying Li, Xinying Hu, Haoyu Liu, Jingjing Zhao, Li Li, Shuanghu Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junfeng Zhao *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
Kang Wang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Xinying HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
Haoyu LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
Jingjing ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
Li LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
Shuanghu YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China. yuanshuanghu@sina.com.

Funding

Jinan Clinical Medicine Science and Technology Innovation Plan 202019060National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC82073345Natural Science Innovation and Development Joint Foundation of Shandong Province ZR202209010002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aims to explore the effect of the estimated dose of radiation to immune cells (EDRIC) on lymphocytes in patients with locally advanced ESCC undergoing NCRT and evaluate the impact of EDRIC on patient prognosis.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients with locally advanced ESCC who received NCRT followed by radical esophagectomy at our institution between March 2016 and December 2022. EDRIC was calculated as a function of the number of fractions and the average doses to the lungs, heart, and remaining body. The optimal cut-off value of EDRIC was determined based on disease-free survival (DFS), and patients were divided into two groups according to this cut-off value. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and DFS.

resultsThe 182 patients included in the study had a mean EDRIC of 5.41 ± 1.70 Gy and an EDRIC cut-off value of 6.86 Gy. Patients with an EDRIC ≤ 6.86 Gy had a significant advantage in DFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.68, P = 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.10-0.48, P = 0.001). EDRIC was closely associated with the lymphocyte nadir (P < 0.001) and lymphocytopenia values (P < 0.001). Patients with a lymphocyte nadir ≤ 0.16 × 10

conclusionEDRIC is an independent prognostic factor for patients with locally advanced ESCC undergoing NCRT. A higher EDRIC is associated with poorer DFS and OS and is closely related to reduced lymphocyte counts. As a quantifiable parameter, future research should explore methods of lowering EDRIC during NCRT while ensuring adequate tumor coverage and sufficient dosage.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaLymphocytesNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalEsophagectomyFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiotherapy DosageEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaEstimated dose of radiation to immune cellsImmune systemLymphocyte nadirNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39934708
PMCPMC11817987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.