ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Taxonomic status and spatial genetic pattern of Taxus in northern and central China: insights from integrative taxonomy, ecology and phylogeography.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic structure, introgression, niche overlap and morphological variation challenge species delimitation in Thymus sect. Mastichina.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- A revision of the genusFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhenotypic, ecological, and genetic differences are crucial for species delimitation and understanding speciation. However, the defining the distribution boundaries and mechanisms driving lineage differentiation of Taxus species in northern and central China remain unclear. This study combines three molecular markers (trnL-trnF, rbcL, ITS), leaf morphological, and ecological data, integrating multiple taxonomy, ecology, and phylogeography approaches to systematically investigate the taxonomic status and spatial genetic patterns of Taxus species in these regions.
resultsA total of 177 samples from 27 populations, representing the natural distribution of Taxus in central and northern China, were collected. T. chinensis (TC) mainly occurs from 1000-2400 m in the south of Qinling Mountains, T. mairei (TM) from 100-1000 m in the south of Daba Mountains, and T. qinlingensis (TQ) from 900-1800 m in the north of Qinling Mountains. The three species overlap in the central Qinling, eastern Daba, and Wushan Mountains at elevations of 900-1800 m. Seventeen haplotypes and 21 ribotypes were identified, forming three clusters corresponding to TC, TM, and TQ. Both cpDNA and nDNA data reveals distinct phylogeographic structures, significant genetic differentiation, and smaller bidirectional gene flow among species. Genetic and niche play a more prominent role in species divergence than morphological traits. Effective population sizes and genetic diversity are higher in TC and TM than in TQ. Suitable habitats expanded southwestward after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and are projected to shift northwestward and contract under future warming scenarios.
conclusionGeologic movement (rapid uplift of the Qinling and surrounding mountains), climate fluctuations (cold-drying effect, and glacial-interglacial cycles), and habitat heterogeneity (gradients in geography and elevation) together shaped interspecific adaptive differentiation and shifts in population dynamics of the three Taxus species. The Qinling-Daba-Wushan mountain range likely played a key role in the independent evolution of these species in local glacial refugia and their post-glacial recontact at the intersection of these mountain ranges. This study provides new insights into the taxonomic status and genetic variation pattern of Taxus species in central and northern China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.