ArticleBMC genomics2025
scMFG: a single-cell multi-omics integration method based on feature grouping.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant Phosphatidylinositol Signalling Network in Cotton Resistance to Verticillium Wilt.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Review
- SpaMFG: a spatial multi-omics integration method based on feature grouping.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics insights into plant genomic imprinting: approaches, challenges, and future perspectives.Briefings in functional genomics · 2026Review
- Clustering single-cell multi-omics data via multi-subspace contrastive learning with structural smoothness.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Identification of causal plasma proteins and targeted therapy for primary hepatic carcinoma via proteome-wide Mendelian randomization.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A Mutational Landscape in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Overview and Prognostic Impacts.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent advancements in methodologies and technologies have enabled the simultaneous measurement of multiple omics data, which provides a comprehensive understanding of cellular heterogeneity. However, existing methods have limitations in accurately identifying cell types while maintaining model interpretability, especially in the presence of noise.
methodsWe propose a novel method called scMFG, which leverages feature grouping and group integration techniques for the integration of single-cell multi-omics data. By organizing features with similar characteristics within each omics layer through feature grouping. Furthermore, scMFG ensures a consistent feature grouping approach across different omics layers, promoting comparability of diverse data types. Additionally, scMFG incorporates a matrix factorization-based approach to enable the integrated results remain interpretable.
resultsWe comprehensively evaluated scMFG's performance on four complex real-world datasets generated using diverse sequencing technologies, highlighting its robustness in accurately identifying cell types. Notably, scMFG exhibited superior performance in deciphering cellular heterogeneity at a finer resolution compared to existing methods when applied to simulated datasets. Furthermore, our method proved highly effective in identifying rare cell types, showcasing its robust performance and suitability for detecting low-abundance cellular populations. The interpretability of scMFG was successfully validated through its specific association of outputs with specific cell types or states observed in the neonatal mouse cerebral cortices dataset. Moreover, we demonstrated that scMFG is capable of identifying cell developmental trajectories even in datasets with batch effects.
conclusionsOur work presents a robust framework for the analysis of single-cell multi-omics data, advancing our understanding of cellular heterogeneity in a comprehensive and interpretable manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.