Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934642›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025

Socio-Demographic Determinants of Mediterranean Diet Adherence: Results of the EU-National Health Interview Survey (EHIS-3).

Ioanna Kontele, Demosthenes Panagiotakos, Mary Yannakoulia, Tonia Vassilakou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ioanna KonteleDepartment of Public Health Policy, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0295-3094
Demosthenes PanagiotakosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8583-153X
Mary YannakouliaDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2171-7337
Tonia VassilakouDepartment of Public Health Policy, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9993-1897

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the well-known benefits of the Mediterranean diet (MD), low adherence is observed globally, highlighting the need to investigate the underlying causes of this trend. Large-scale, periodically repeated surveys, such as the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS), could be useful for the investigation of the factors that influence adherence to healthy dietary patterns. National EHIS-3 in Greece was designed to collect data on the consumption of all food groups, making it possible to determine adherence to MD. METHODOLOGY: This study aimed to investigate the socioeconomic factors that influence MD adherence by conducting a secondary data analysis from 7706 participants aged 15-85 years who participated in the 2019 national EHIS. MD adherence was evaluated by MedDietScore. Bivariate comparisons between the score tertiles and socioeconomic groups were performed. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the association between MedDietScore tertiles and demographic and socioeconomic factors, using high adherence as the reference category. Finally, cluster analysis was applied to identify the most significant factors in relation to the classification of the participants in MD adherence groups.

resultsEducational level, followed by income status, emerged as the most significant factor associated with adherence to MD. Individuals who have attained only primary education had a 3.80 times higher likelihood of presenting low MD adherence instead of high MD adherence compared to persons with tertiary education. Individuals in the lower income group had 2.53 times higher odds of being in the low MD adherence instead of high MD adherence than individuals in the higher income group. These relationships remained statistically significant after adjusting for confounding factors. The group that most frequently adhered to high MD (53.4%) comprised individuals who had tertiary education, higher income, and were couples without children. Conversely, those with primary or secondary education who are single parents or live in one-person households and fall into the lower and medium income groups are most likely to have low MD adherence (44.8%).

conclusionsPublic policies to promote MD adherence should consider socioeconomic factors. Integrating questions to evaluate adherence to dietary patterns into EHIS would allow for future intercountry and longitudinal comparisons.

Indexed as

Diet, MediterraneanPatient ComplianceSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleGreeceHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adulteducationemploymentfood policyincomemarital statusnutrition

Identifiers

PMID39934642
PMCPMC11814368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.