ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025
Ocular Manifestations and Pathological Features in Goldenhar Syndrome: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Goldenhar Syndrome-Embryological, Anatomical, Etiopathogenic Mechanisms and Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study characterized the ocular manifestations and associated pathological features in a large cohort of patients diagnosed with Goldenhar syndrome (GS).
methodsPatients diagnosed with GS at the Department of Ophthalmology at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively identified. Each patient underwent a standardized ophthalmological assessment and relevant tests. Epibulbar choristomas and eyelid colobomas were further categorized into different clinical groups, and their incidence rates and associated pathological features were evaluated.
resultsA total of 72 patients diagnosed with GS (98 affected eyes) were included. The most prevalent ocular manifestations were epibulbar choristoma (94.44%) and upper eyelid coloboma (50%). Epibulbar choristomas were classified into four groups, with group II epibulbar choristomas being the most common (29.79%). The pathological features of the epibulbar choristomas varied significantly with location (p < 0.001): the choristomas located at the limbus were all dermoids (100%); lipodermoid was the most prevalent type located at the conjunctiva (40%); and dermoid was the predominant type of choristoma involving both the limbus and conjunctiva (50%), followed by lipodermoid (27.27%) and complex choristoma (22.73%). Upper eyelid colobomas were predominantly unilateral, with mild, moderate, and severe defects in 32.5%, 52.5%, and 15% of the cases, respectively. There was a significant coincidence and severity association between upper eyelid colobomas and epibulbar choristomas (p < 0.05).
conclusionsOur study represents the largest reported case series of GS to date and highlights the prevalence of epibulbar choristomas and upper eyelid colobomas. While the predominant pathological type of epibulbar choristomas overall is dermoid, distinct pathological features have been correlated with their anatomic location or clinical group. Upper eyelid colobomas tended to be located on the inner side, often presenting as mild-to-moderate defects and frequently co-occurring with epibulbar choristomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.