ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2025
Computational Design and Optimization of Multi-Compound Multivesicular Liposomes for Co-Delivery of Traditional Chinese Medicine Compounds.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on the molecular mechanisms of chlorogenic acid's pharmacological effects and its advanced drug delivery systems.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Next-generation cancer therapeutics: unveiling the potential of liposome-based nanoparticles through bioinformatics.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study explored the synergistic anti-tumor effects of a combination of compounds from Traditional Chinese Medicine, including rosmarinic acid (RA), chlorogenic acid (CA), and scoparone (SCO), in the formulation of multivesicular liposomes (MVLs). Optimization of formulations and process parameters was essential to achieve effective liposomal encapsulation and optimal release profiles for these three compounds with diverse properties. Traditional trial-and-error approaches are inefficient for the optimization of complex multi-compound MVLs. We developed a new formulation optimization model, which could address this issue by predicting the optimal multi-compound MVLs formulation. Our machine learning model integrated support vector machine regression (SVR) algorithm and cuckoo search (CS) algorithm, resulting in three CS-SVR models to predict single-compound MVLs. The CS algorithm, with various weighting rules, was then applied to search the best formulation parameters across three CS-SVR models and to maximize the encapsulation efficiency for all three compounds. The multi-compound MLVs were subsequently prepared under the predicted conditions, achieving an optimized particle size of 15.12 µm, with encapsulation efficiencies of 82.93 ± 2.43% for CA, 82.22 ± 1.25% for RA, and 95.60 ± 0.18% for SCO. The predicted optimal multi-compound MVLs were further validated through in vitro characterization and in vivo anti-tumor experiments, showing a promising synergistic anti-tumor effect consistent with in vitro results. This model accurately predicted optimal encapsulation conditions, which were validated experimentally, demonstrating improved encapsulation efficiencies and reduced trial-and-error iterations. Collectively, our model provides a predictive pathway for multi-compound MVLs formulation, indicating the ability of this model to significantly reduce experimental burden and accelerate formulation development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39934607What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.