Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934553›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2025

Key strategies for reducing recurrence in T1 bladder cancer. Evidence from a retrospective multicenter European study.

Roberto Contieri, Alexandre Guigui, Bastien Gondran-Tellier, Giuseppe Basile, Fabio Zattoni, Andrea Gallioli, Paolo Verri, Julia Aumatell, Eric Lechevallier, Cyrille Bastide and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Roberto ContieriDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Alexandre GuiguiDepartment of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Bastien Gondran-TellierDepartment of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Giuseppe BasileUnit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Fabio ZattoniDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Andrea GallioliDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Paolo VerriDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Julia AumatellDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eric LechevallierDepartment of Urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Cyrille BastideDepartment of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Akram AkikiDepartment of Urology, Aubagne Hospital, Aubagne, France.
Harry ToledanoDepartment of Urology, Martigues Hospital, Martigues, France.
Marco MoschiniDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Daniele AmparoreDepartment of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Laura S MertensDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Benjamin PradereService d'Urologie, Clinique de La Croix du Sud, Toulouse, France.
Paweł RajwaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Jeremy Y C TeohDepartment of Surgery, S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Francesco PorpigliaDepartment of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Francesco MontorsiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Michael BaboudjianDepartment of Urology, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, APHM, Marseille, France.
Alessandro UleriDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. alessandrouleri@outlook.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo evaluate whether adherence to specific quality criteria in the management of T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) undergoing second-look transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) leads to improved oncological outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective multicenter study included patients diagnosed between 2015 and 2021 with high or very-high-risk a NMIBC after initial TURBT, followed by second-look TURBT and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) adjuvant therapy. Key management steps assessed included enhanced tumor visualization, complete resection, timing of second look, detrusor muscle presence in specimens, and adequate BCG therapy. The primary endpoint was bladder recurrence-free survival (RFS), analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.

resultsAmong 226 patients included, the median age was 73(65-79) years, and 49 were classified in the very high-risk group (22%). Second-look TURBT was performed with a median delay of 8 (6-10) weeks. Factors significantly impacting 3-year RFS included adequate BCG exposure (HR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.93; p = 0.03) and the presence of residual tumor at second-look TURBT (HR = 2.55; 95% CI 1.48-4.39; p < 0.001). Neither the use of photodynamic diagnostics nor timing beyond 6 weeks for second-look TURBT significantly influenced outcomes (p > 0.05).

conclusionsIn T1 NMIBC, adequate BCG therapy and absence of residual tumor at second-look TURBT are the primary predictors of 3-year RFS. These findings emphasize the importance of quality management in TURBT procedures and patient treatment.

Indexed as

CystectomyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedBCG VaccineEuropeFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesBCG VaccineBCGBladder cancerRecurrenceT1Turbt

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.