ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
Engineering bacteriophages for targeted superbug eradication.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- CRISPR-Cas systems as next-generation antimicrobials: a systemic review of mechanisms, delivery strategies, and translational challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- The synergistic antibacterial and anti-biofilm effects of fluoxetine and quercetin against carbapenemase producing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- The WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria: challenges and opportunities for next-generation antimicrobial development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Biofilms Exposed: Innovative Imaging and Therapeutic Platforms for Persistent Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Cytokines Meet Phages: A Revolutionary Pathway to Modulating Immunity and Microbial Balance.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, termed "superbugs," presents a formidable challenge to global health. These pathogens, often responsible for persistent nosocomial infections, threaten the effectiveness of conventional antibiotic therapies. This review delves into the potential of bacteriophages, viruses specifically targeting bacteria, as a powerful tool to combat superbugs. We examined the latest developments in genetic engineering that improve the efficacy of bacteriophages, focusing on modifications in host range, lysis mechanisms, and their ability to overcome bacterial defense systems. This review article highlights the CRISPR-Cas system as a promising method for precisely manipulating phage genomes, enabling the development of novel phage therapies with enhanced efficacy and specificity. Furthermore, we discussed developing novel phage-based strategies, such as phage cocktails and phage-antibiotic combinations. We also analyzed the challenges and ethical considerations associated with phage engineering, emphasizing the need for responsible and rigorous research to ensure this technology's safe and effective deployment to combat the growing threat of antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39934535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.