Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934518›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2025

Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Visual Field in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Under Moderate and Deep Neuromuscular Blockade: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Marcelo Nogueira Cruz da Silva, Ed Carlos Rey Moura, Caio Marcio Barros Oliveira, João Nogueira Neto, Roclides Castro de Lima, Almir Vieira Dibai Filho, José Aparecido Valadão, Hiago Parreão Braga, Plínio da Cunha Leal

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcelo Nogueira Cruz da SilvaFederal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil. marcelolandrix@hotmail.com.
Ed Carlos Rey MouraFederal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Caio Marcio Barros OliveiraFederal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
João Nogueira NetoFederal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Roclides Castro de LimaFederal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Almir Vieira Dibai FilhoFederal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
José Aparecido ValadãoFederal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Hiago Parreão BragaHospital São Domingos, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.
Plínio da Cunha LealFederal University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe sustained administration of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) improves surgical conditions compared to moderate NMB and might be effective in the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sustained intravenous deep NMB on improving surgical conditions and pain intensity following LRYGB.

methodsThis randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil, between October 2021 and December 2023. Patients undergoing LRYGB were randomly assigned to moderate (reversed with 2 mg/kg of sugammadex) or deep NMB (reversed with 4 mg/kg of sugammadex).

resultsSeventy-one patients were evaluated in the study, divided into moderate NMB with 37 patients and deep NMB group with 34 patients. There was no difference between the groups regarding gender, age, weight, height, and comorbidities. Also, in the duration of anesthesia (moderate, 2 h 26 min; deep, 2 h 27 min; p = 0.876), duration of surgery (moderate, 1 h 39 min; deep NMB: 1 h 40 min; p = 0.931), time to extubation (moderate, 5 min; deep, 7 min; p = 0.252), time to the first morphine request (moderate, 30 min; deep, 25 min on average; p = 0.776), mean morphine consumption in 24 h (moderate, 14 mg; deep, 10 mg; p = 0.133), and sevoflurane consumption (moderate, 50 mL; deep 50 mL; p = 0.884). There was no significant difference between the groups in pain scores at none of the evaluated moments. The Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale revealed a significant difference between the groups at 20/30 min (p = 0.015) and 60/70 min (p = 0.027), respectively.

conclusionThis study demonstrated improved surgical field visibility with deep compared to moderate NMB, without significant differences in other evaluated variables.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassLaparoscopyNeuromuscular BlockadeObesity, MorbidPostoperative PainAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementSugammadexSugammadexGastric bypassLaparoscopyNeuromuscular blockade

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.