ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2025
Bayesian estimation of transmission networks for infectious diseases.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing subsampling strategies for efficient pairwise analysis of large pathogen genomic and spatial datasets: An application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A Bayesian Framework for the Network Analysis of Transmission Dynamics in Infectious Disease.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- The Role of Community Networks in the Transmission and Persistence ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reconstructing transmission networks is essential for identifying key factors like superspreaders and high-risk locations, which are critical for developing effective pandemic prevention strategies. This study presents a Bayesian transmission model that combines genomic and temporal data to reconstruct transmission networks for infectious diseases. The Bayesian transmission model incorporates the latent period and distinguishes between symptom onset and actual infection time, improving the accuracy of transmission dynamics and epidemiological models. It also assumes a homogeneous effective population size among hosts, ensuring that the coalescent process for within-host evolution remains unchanged, even with missing intermediate hosts. This allows the model to effectively handle incomplete samples. Simulation results demonstrate the model's ability to accurately estimate model parameters and transmission networks. Additionally, our proposed hypothesis test can reliably identify direct transmission events. The Bayesian transmission model was applied to a real dataset of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomes from 69 tuberculosis cases. The estimated transmission network revealed two major groups, each with a superspreader who transmitted M. tuberculosis, either directly or indirectly, to 28 and 21 individuals, respectively. The hypothesis test identified 16 direct transmissions within the estimated network, demonstrating the Bayesian model's advantage over a fixed threshold by providing a more flexible criterion for identifying direct transmissions. This Bayesian approach highlights the critical role of genetic data in reconstructing transmission networks and enhancing our understanding of the origins and transmission dynamics of infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.