ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025
Plant-based dietary patterns, genetic risk, proteome, and lung cancer risk: a large prospective cohort study.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Healthful and unhealthful plant-based diets and site-specific cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.European journal of nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Dietary risk factors for lung cancer: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Proteomics for precision nutrition: current evidence and future directions.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026Review
- Association between planetary health diet index and lung cancer risk in 106,542 participants: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Dietary patterns, polygenic risk, and kidney cancer incidence: a UK Biobank cohort study.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to examine the associations between plant-based dietary patterns, genetic risk, proteins, and lung cancer risk.
methods189,541 participants of the UK Biobank were included. The Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic splines were performed to assess the associations between overall plant-based diet index(PDI), healthy PDI (hPDI), and unhealthy PDI (uPDI) and lung cancer risk. Polygenic risk score (PRS) was constructed to assess its joint effect with PDIs on lung cancer risk. Mediation analysis was conducted to examine which proteins mediated the associations of PDIs with incident lung cancer.
resultsHigher PDI was significantly correlated with reduced lung cancer risk(HR:0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96, per SD). An elevated uPDI showed a significant correlation with an increased lung cancer risk(HR:1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.15, per SD). Individuals with a combination of high PRS and low PDI (HR: 2.09 [95% CI: 1.48-2.95]) or high uPDI (HR: 1.86 [95% CI: 1.36-2.53]) exhibited a notably higher lung cancer risk compared to those with low PRS and a high PDI or low uPDI. 42 proteins mediated the effect of PDI on lung cancer risk, and the association between uPDI with lung cancer was mediated by 117 proteins. The number of proteins displaying pathway enrichment within the cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction was the highest of the proteins mediated the effect of associations of PDI and uPDI with lung cancer risk.
conclusionA higher PDI correlated with reduced lung cancer risk, while a higher uPDI correlated with an elevated lung cancer risk. Low PDI jointing with high genetic risk increased lung cancer risk. Proteins enriched in cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction may mediate the association between plant-based dietary patterns with lung cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39934487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.