ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025
[Sustainability in practices and thought processes in prehospital emergency medicine : A survey of emergency service personnel].
Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSustainability in emergency medicine constitutes a nascent area of inquiry that has thus far attracted limited scholarly attention; however, it is experiencing burgeoning interest. To date, there are no empirical studies examining how emergency medical personnel evaluate the concept of sustainability or what specific aspects and propositions they may have regarding the topic.
objectivesThe primary objective of this study was to investigate the perspectives of emergency medical employees concerning the concept of sustainability in prehospital emergency medicine. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn online survey comprising 23 questions was administered. Participation was voluntary and conducted anonymously.
resultsA total of 462 participants participated in the survey, predominantly consisting of paramedics (74% male, 26% female), aged between 25 and 44. Approximately 70% of respondents expressed that they had contemplated the potential for enhancing sustainability within emergency medicine. Participants deemed the separation of packaging as a practical measure, particularly concerning syringes, cannulas and infusion systems. The estimated incidence of contamination for these materials is less than 50%. Nevertheless, factors such as insufficient time, space or motivation are cited as barriers to effective waste separation. Packaging, especially for patient blankets, cervical collars and infection protection gowns, is identified as potentially superfluous. Participants indicated that the majority of waste is attributed to plastic packaging and disposable gloves.
conclusionThe findings of this study indicate that emergency medicine employees are aware of sustainability issues. Participants identified pragmatic avenues for waste separation and reduction in prehospital patient care, while also acknowledging potential challenges. Further research is needed to elucidate sustainability opportunities within prehospital emergency medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39934447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.