Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934392›Full record

GuidelineOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Evidence-based joint statement position of perioperative bone optimization in the arthroplasty candidate, from FEMECOT, AMMOM, ACOMM, SCCOT, SECOT, SEFRAOS, SEIOMM.

López-Cervantes Roberto Enrique, Torres-Naranjo Francisco, Etxebarria-Foronda Iñigo, Ojeda-Thies Cristina, Linares-Restrepo Francisco, Gonzalez-Reyes Miguel Angel, Caeiro-Rey Jose Ramón, Garin-Zertuche Dario Esau

Abstract readConsensus StatementPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

López-Cervantes Roberto EnriqueMexican Federation of Colleges of Orthopedics and Trauma (FEMECOT), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. drrobertolc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-1910
Torres-Naranjo FranciscoMexican Association of Osteoporosis and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Etxebarria-Foronda IñigoSpanish Society of Osteoporotic Fractures (SEFRAOS), Madrid, Spain.
Ojeda-Thies CristinaSpanish Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (SECOT), Madrid, Spain.
Linares-Restrepo FranciscoColombian Society of Osteoporosis and Mineral Metabolism (ACOMM), Bogotá, Colombia.
Gonzalez-Reyes Miguel AngelColombian Society of Orthopedic Surgery and Trauma (SCCOT), Bogotá, Colombia.
Caeiro-Rey Jose RamónSpanish Society of Bone Research and Mineral Metabolism (SEIOMM), Madrid, Spain.
Garin-Zertuche Dario EsauMexican Federation of Colleges of Orthopedics and Trauma (FEMECOT), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of patients living with joint replacements is increasing. Nearly two-thirds of patients undergoing elective arthroplasty procedures have low bone mineral density (LBMD), defined as osteopenia in 38.5% and osteoporosis in 24.8%; among those with osteoporosis, only 32.8% received treatment at the time of surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsA group of 7 national societies (FEMECOT, AMMOM, ACOMM, SCCOT, SECOT, SEFRAOS, SEIOMM) developed a joint statement position on the diagnosis of osteoporosis and perioperative bone optimization in candidates for arthroplasty "Arthroplasty Bone Optimization." We performed a scoping review of the available literature, followed by a systematic review and meta-analysis. Subsequently, a Delphi-modified method was used to gather the different positions.

resultsAfter analyzing the literature, we came up with five recommendations: (1) Patients scheduled for elective arthroplasty should undergo a bone health assessment (BHA). (2) If poor bone quality is observed during surgery and a bone health assessment has not been conducted promptly, a complete BHA, including a DXA scan, is imperative. (3) In the arthroplasty candidate, if LBMD or osteoporosis are noticed, bone loss-related factors should be corrected, and appropriate treatment for osteoporosis should be started before or right after arthroplasty. The use of anti-resorptive and bone anabolic agents has been shown to reduce periprosthetic bone loss, complications, and non-septic revision rates after joint arthroplasty. (4) In arthroplasty candidates, the diagnosis of osteoporosis or low bone mineral density (LBMD) should not delay the surgery. (5) Monitoring central and periprosthetic bone mineral density through DXA protocols can help identify bone loss in central and periprosthetic areas in patients with risk factors or osteoporosis.

conclusionsPerioperative bone optimization should be considered in all patients who are candidates for arthroplasty. The orthopedic surgeon and multidisciplinary team should be encouraged to diagnose and treat the arthroplasty candidates' bone by screening for bone loss-related factors and diagnosing osteoporosis and starting treatment according to the current international guidelines. Following these recommendations could reduce periprosthetic bone loss, complications, and aseptic revision rates following arthroplasty surgery. More research is needed to understand the implications of osteoporosis and its treatment for joint replacement outcomes and long-term survival.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, ReplacementOsteoporosisPerioperative CareBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsBone Diseases, MetabolicElective Surgical ProceduresEvidence-Based MedicineHumansBone Density Conservation AgentsArthroplastyBone lossBone optimizationOsteoporosisRevision arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.