ArticleScientific reports2025
Construction and verification of a nomogram model for the risk of death in sepsis patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for mortality in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Mortality Prediction in Septic Patients with Prolonged or Chronic Critical Illness.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis and implications of validation results for a clinical data-based early warning model for geriatric sepsis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Constructing an early warning model for elderly sepsis patients based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of the prognostic effect of mitophagy-related genes in acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
At present, there is insufficient evidence to evaluate the prognosis of patients with sepsis. This study anazed the clinical data of 822 sepsis patients in the ICU of a tertiary Grade A hospital to construct and validate a nomogram model for predicting the 28-day mortality risk in sepsis patients. The model was constructed using multivariate logistic regression analysis to screen for independent risk factors affecting prognosis, and a mortality risk prediction model was built based on these independent risk factors. The performance of the model was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Multivariate logistic regression identified five independent risk factors for 28-day mortality in sepsis patients: Age, SOFA score, CRP, Mechanical ventilation, and the use of Vasoactive drugs. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for these factors were 1.037 (1.024-1.050), 1.093 (1.044-1.145), 1.034 (1.026-1.042), 1.967 (1.176-3.328), and 2.515 (1.611-3.941), respectively, with all P-values < 0.05. Based on these five independent risk factors, a nomogram model was constructed, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in the training set and external validation set being 0.849 (95% CI 0.818-0.880) and 0.837 (95% CI 0.887-0.886), respectively. Both the DCA curve and calibration plot confirmed that the model has good clinical efficacy. The nomogram prediction model established in this study has excellent predictive ability, which can help clinicians identify high-risk patients early and provide guidance for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.