Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934373›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Construction and verification of a nomogram model for the risk of death in sepsis patients.

Yanjie Yang, Huiling Zhao, Ge Ling, Shupeng Liu, Yue Sun, Hu Peng, Xin Gu, Li Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yanjie Yang *Department of Nursing, The People's Hospital of Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Changji, 831100, China.
Huiling ZhaoDepartment of Nursing, The People's Hospital of Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Changji, 831100, China.
Ge LingCentre for Critical Care Medicine, The People's Hospital of Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Changji, 831100, China.
Shupeng LiuCentre for Critical Care Medicine, The People's Hospital of Changji Hui Autonomous Prefecture, Changji, 831100, China.
Yue SunThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Day Diagnosis and Treatment Ward 3, Ürümqi, 830000, China.
Hu PengThe Nursing School, Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, China.
Xin Gu *The Nursing School, Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, 830000, China. 15160913336@163.com.

Funding

the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation 320.6750.2023-02-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, there is insufficient evidence to evaluate the prognosis of patients with sepsis. This study anazed the clinical data of 822 sepsis patients in the ICU of a tertiary Grade A hospital to construct and validate a nomogram model for predicting the 28-day mortality risk in sepsis patients. The model was constructed using multivariate logistic regression analysis to screen for independent risk factors affecting prognosis, and a mortality risk prediction model was built based on these independent risk factors. The performance of the model was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Multivariate logistic regression identified five independent risk factors for 28-day mortality in sepsis patients: Age, SOFA score, CRP, Mechanical ventilation, and the use of Vasoactive drugs. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for these factors were 1.037 (1.024-1.050), 1.093 (1.044-1.145), 1.034 (1.026-1.042), 1.967 (1.176-3.328), and 2.515 (1.611-3.941), respectively, with all P-values < 0.05. Based on these five independent risk factors, a nomogram model was constructed, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in the training set and external validation set being 0.849 (95% CI 0.818-0.880) and 0.837 (95% CI 0.887-0.886), respectively. Both the DCA curve and calibration plot confirmed that the model has good clinical efficacy. The nomogram prediction model established in this study has excellent predictive ability, which can help clinicians identify high-risk patients early and provide guidance for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

NomogramsSepsisAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveArea under the receiver operating characteristic curveIntensive care unitMortality risk factorsNomogram modelPrognostic outcomeSepsis

Identifiers

PMID39934373
PMCPMC11814130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.