ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Exploring clinical trials awareness, information access and participation amongst Australians with ovarian cancer: a qualitative study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The experience and supportive care needs in people affected by ovarian cancer and their informal caregivers: a qualitative systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Listening to Australians with ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional survey investigating clinical trials awareness, information access and participation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOvarian cancer is associated with advanced stage diagnosis and poor survival rates. Clinical trials are critical for improving both clinical and quality of life outcomes. Challenges exist to clinical trials awareness, information access and participation, but perspectives of Australians with ovarian cancer have not been previously investigated. We aimed to explore clinical trials awareness, information access and participation amongst Australians with ovarian cancer.
methodsUtilising an exploratory qualitative approach, women with ovarian cancer participated in online focus groups and interviews between December 2023 and February 2024. Transcripts underwent inductive content analysis.
resultsFive themes and five subthemes emerged. In theme 1, participants identified "Barriers exist that affect clinical trial awareness and participation" and were explored through their experience of ovarian cancer. In theme 2, participants shared that "Instigating the conversation and doing my own research" was necessary to access clinical trials. Theme 3 describes ideas on "Finding solutions to improve clinical trial awareness and information access" through subthemes: "we need a centralised, credible source"; "communicate clinical trials in various ways from trusted contacts"; and "I want tailored, relevant information". Theme 4 explained that "Altruism is a motivator" in willingness to participate in trials. Finally, in theme 5, participants explained that "Emotions regarding clinical trials are varied" illustrated in subthemes: "feeling left behind" and "feeling fortunate".
conclusionsThese qualitative insights will inform development of a cross-sectional survey for national distribution amongst Australians with ovarian cancer. Results will assist in developing solutions to improve clinical trials awareness and information access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.