Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934349›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Visual perception of wind hazards using cycloidal scanning LiDAR system.

Gunzung Kim, Jeongsook Eom, Yongwan Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gunzung KimInstitute of Information and Communication, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 38541, Republic of Korea. gzkim@yu.ac.kr.
Jeongsook EomDepartment of Multimedia and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 38541, Republic of Korea.
Yongwan ParkSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 38541, Republic of Korea. ywpark@yu.ac.kr.

Funding

Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2B5B02086773Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1I1A1A01070998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) is particularly vulnerable to wind hazards, and conventional weather monitoring tools often do not offer the detailed, real-time information needed for safe operations. This research, which examines the visual perception of the on-board cycloidal scanning LiDAR system in improving UAM safety, is of significant importance. The cycloidal scanning LiDAR system, designed explicitly for on-board integration, delivers high-resolution visual mapping, real-time data processing, and comprehensive environmental scanning with 360° rotational capabilities. Its lightweight design and low power consumption make it well-suited for UAM applications, providing continual visual updates on wind conditions along the flight path. This study underscores the system's effectiveness in providing advanced visual perception for UAM operations. By emphasizing the crucial role of visual perception in identifying and responding to wind hazards, the research highlights the significance of this technology in guaranteeing safe and efficient UAM operations. Striking a balance between real-time visual capabilities and practical considerations such as power, size, and weight is vital to optimizing UAM safety and efficiency.

Indexed as

DWDMALiDAROptical OFDMARisley prismUrban air mobilityVariable field-of-viewVisual perceptionWind hazards

Identifiers

PMID39934349
PMCPMC11814304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.