Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934337›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025

Feasibility and efficacy of therapeutic drug monitoring of abiraterone in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients.

Maud B A van der Kleij, Marinda Meertens, Stefanie L Groenland, Sil Kordes, Andries M Bergman, Jeantine M de Feijter, Alwin D R Huitema, Neeltje Steeghs, Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group (DPOG)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maud B A van der KleijDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.vd.kleij@nki.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8492-8039
Marinda MeertensDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefanie L GroenlandDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sil KordesDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andries M BergmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5223-2549
Jeantine M de FeijterDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alwin D R HuitemaDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neeltje SteeghsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-2279
Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group (DPOG)

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline foundation (GSK) No grant number, unrestricted grantIpsen Fund No grant number, unrestricted grantNovartis No grant number, unrestricted grantPfizer (Pfizer Inc.) No grant number, unrestricted grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies demonstrated better outcomes for mCRPC (metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer) patients with higher abiraterone exposure (minimal plasma concentration (C

methodsPatients with low exposure levels (Low-group, C

resultsWe included 167 mCRPC patients, with 56 in the Adequate-group and 111 in the Low-group. Interventions were successful 86% of the time. Exposure between groups became corresponding (Low-group: 7.95 to 20.5 ng/mL, Adequate-group: 20.8 ng/mL, p = 0.72) with comparable AE incidence (17% vs. 23%, p = 0.4). Median ToT and PSArr were similar (351 vs. 379 days, p = 0.35; 61.3% vs. 67.9%, p = 0.51).

conclusionsPK-guided interventions improved above target exposure from 33.5% to 81.4% of patients without additional AEs. While historically, low exposure patients had significantly shorter survival, PK-guided interventions eliminated this disparity. As interventions are effective, low-cost and safe, TDM for abiraterone should be considered to enhance treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

AndrostenesDrug MonitoringProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeabirateroneAndrostenesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID39934337
PMCPMC11961573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.