Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934279›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Feasibility and outcome of transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct exploration as first-line treatment for common bile duct stones: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Lea Sander Berg, Hans Friis-Andersen, Nellie Bering Zinther, Mehmet Öztoprak, Kåre Andersson Gotschalck

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lea Sander BergDepartment of Surgery, The Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark. leasander95@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0000-4475-614X
Hans Friis-AndersenDepartment of Surgery, The Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Nellie Bering ZintherDepartment of Surgery, The Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0009-2200-5471
Mehmet ÖztoprakDepartment of Surgery, The Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6600-8767
Kåre Andersson GotschalckDepartment of Surgery, The Regional Hospital Horsens, Sundvej 30, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-2231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS), guidelines recommend a one-stage approach, including laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) or intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (intraERCP). Studies show favourable outcomes with transcystic LCBDE (tLCBDE), but this technique is not widely adopted. The use of tLCBDE may be limited by several factors, but to what degree is unknown. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility and, secondarily, outcomes of tLCBDE for patients undergoing removal of CBDS and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) when tLCBDE is the first-line treatment.

methodA retrospective cross-sectional study including patients with removal of CBDS and LC at Horsens Regional Hospital during June 2017-March 2022. We classified patients into three groups: tLCBDE, preoperative ERCP (preERCP), and other procedures. The reasons for not performing tLCBDE were registered from medical charts. In the tLCBDE and the preERCP group, we registered clearance rate, postoperative complications, and subsequent ERCP.

resultsIn total, 229 patients received a procedure due to CBDS, of which 73% were emergency procedures. The groups were as follows: 179 (78%) tLCBDE, 25 (11%) preERCP, and 25 (11%) other procedures. preERCP was chosen due to the patient being unfit for emergency surgery, tLCBDE not being technically possible, and other reasons. Other procedures were chosen, because tLCBDE was not technically possible, lack of equipment or qualified surgeon, and other reasons. In the tLCBDE group, 94% of patients with CBDS were cleared, 5.6% had a complication of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3, and 3.9% patients needed a subsequent ERCP.

conclusiontLCBDE is feasible, safe, and effective treatment which can be performed in the majority of patients with CBDS and should be considered an equivalent to ERCP or choledochotomy as first-line treatment of patients with CBDS. As some patients require ERCP or choledochotomy, tLCBDE should not be the sole treatment available.

Indexed as

CholangiographyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicGallstonesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCommon bile duct stonesEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyLaparoscopic common bile duct explorationTranscystic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.