ArticleScientific reports2025
Trajectories of quality of life during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: longitudinal cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and effectiveness evaluation of a mobile health-based follow-up management model for patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Attachment Styles and Sexual Function Among Survivors of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Symptom clusters and sentinel symptoms during post-transplant recovery in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A cross-sectional study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Advancing Knowledge of Acute Cutaneous Graft-Versus-Host Disease Wound Care: A Case Study.Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an integral part of the therapy for many hematological malignancies. HSCT greatly impacts quality of life (QoL). However, few studies evaluate patients' QoL throughout hospitalization for HSCT. This study aimed to measure the trajectory of patients' QoL during HSCT depending on the type of transplantation (auto vs. allo-HSCT). Participants completed FACT-BMT at four time points: on admission to the hospital, on the day before HSCT, six days after HSCT, and on discharge from the hospital. A total of 153 participants completed the study, 51.6% female (mean age 50.4 years). Most patients were treated with auto-HSCT (54.9%), while the remainder received allo-HSCT (45.1%). The analyses showed significant differences in the magnitude of QoL during the hospitalization period (p < 0.001). The overall QoL trend was parabolic, deteriorating from admission, reaching its lowest six days after HSCT, and then improving at discharge, but not returning to the baseline level. The trajectory of the changes in QoL was not influenced by the type of transplantation (auto-HSCT or allo-HSCT) (p = 0.901). QoL changes dramatically following HSCT. Psychosocial interventions before and after HSCT are needed to prepare patients for possible concerns related to prolonged hospitalization, even as physical well-being improves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.