Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934251›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Pigs solve a cooperative task without showing a clear understanding of the need for a partner.

Jim McGetrick, Kimberly Brosche, Clémence Nanchen, Jean-Loup Rault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jim McGetrick *Institute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria. james.mcgetrick@univie.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-5468-934X
Kimberly Brosche *Institute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2809-8591
Clémence NanchenInstitute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Jean-Loup RaultInstitute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6015-8318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animal species engage in cooperation, whereby they act together, typically to achieve a common goal. Domestic pigs were recently shown to lift a log together in pairs in the joint log-lift (JLL) task to access food treats. However, it is not yet clear whether pigs understand that they need a partner for this task. To investigate this, we applied a recruitment approach similar to that used for chimpanzees, coral trout, wolves and dogs. Pigs that were proficient with the JLL task were given access to the task on their own but could open a door to recruit a familiar partner from an adjacent enclosure. Pigs opened the door in all experimental conditions, allowing the partner to enter (if a partner was present). Comparing across conditions, latencies to open the door and to return to the box after opening the door generally did not suggest that subjects understood the need for the partner. As with many animal species in cooperative tasks, pigs may achieve a complex cooperative outcome in the JLL task without a full understanding of the need for a partner.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCooperative BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMaleSwineCoordinationJoint actionPorcineSocial behaviourSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID39934251
PMCPMC11814144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.