Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934245›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Transformation of free-text radiology reports into structured data].

Markus M Graf, Keno K Bressem, Lisa C Adams

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Multidisciplinary attitudes towards LLM-structured oncologic CT reports: a prospective fixed-sequence questionnaire study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Markus M Graf
Keno K Bressem
Lisa C AdamsInstitut für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM Klinikum, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. lisa.adams@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid development of large language models (LLMs) opens up new possibilities for the automated processing of medical texts. Transforming unstructured radiology reports into structured data is crucial for efficient use in clinical decision support systems, research, and improving patient care.

objectivesWhat are the challenges of transforming natural language radiology reports into structured data using LLMs? Which methods and architectures are promising? How can the quality and reliability of the extracted data be ensured? MATERIALS AND

methodsThis article examines current research on the application of LLMs in radiological information processing. Various approaches such as rule-based systems, machine learning, and deep learning models, particularly neural network architectures, are analyzed and compared. The focus is on extracting information such as diagnoses, anatomical locations, findings, and measurements. RESULTS AND

conclusionLLMs show great potential in transforming reports into structured data. In particular, deep learning models trained on large datasets achieve high accuracies. However, challenges remain, such as dealing with ambiguities, abbreviations, and the variability of linguistic expressions. Combining LLMs with domain-specific knowledge, for example, in the form of ontologies, can further improve the performance of the systems. Integrating contextual information and developing robust evaluation metrics are also important research directions.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingRadiology Information SystemsDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceLarge language modelsMachine learningNatural language processing (NLP)Structured findings

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.