ArticleScientific reports2025
Agromorphological and biochemical characterization of mutagens induced M3 mutant lines of grasspea.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial mutation dynamics emerging insights into virulence evolution and drug resistance. A review study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of genetic diversity and elucidation of population structure of Lathyrus accessions using agro-morphological characters and ISSR technique.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grasspea is one of the important cool season legumes in India and it is hardy in nature. Although this crop is robust, it is not commonly grown because presence of more amount of the β-N-oxalyl-L-α, β diaminopropionic acid (β-ODAP) in the seeds and it causes neurolathyrism. Due to low levels of genetic variation in β-ODAP content in grasspea made it difficult to improve through traditional breeding. However, induced mutagenesis can be a useful and alternative method to add more genetic variability, opening up more possibilities for the identification and characterization of new genetic variations. In this study, three varieties (Nirmal, Biol-212 and Berhampur Local) seeds were treated with physical mutagen (γ-rays) chemical mutagen (EMS) and their combinations. M1, M2 and M3 populations were developed by these mutagenic treatments. The M3 populations of all three varieties were screened for morphological, yield and biochemical traits. A wider range of induced viable mutants was found in Biol-212 indicated that variety is more susceptible to both mutagens than the other two. Only two Nirmal mutants, seven Biol-212 mutants and five Berhampur Local mutants were non-segregating and performed better than their parents in terms of improved biochemical parameters such as low β-ODAP and Trypsin Inhibitor, and more protein content and yield. Mutation creates variability for biochemical traits and selecting progenies for favorable means and higher variances in the early generations will be highly beneficial, ultimately contributing to the enhancement of yield and its components in the M3 generation. Grasspea germplasm might be enhanced by the mutants exhibiting higher yield with improve biochemical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.