Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934171›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A symmetry-based mechanism for perceptual grouping in preverbal infants.

Alessandra Geraci, Maria Loconsole, Lucia Regolin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alessandra Geraci *Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy. alessandra.geraci@unict.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1375-9190
Maria Loconsole *Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. maria.loconsole@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0024-2670
Lucia RegolinDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8960-0309

Funding

European Union- Next Generation EU. Prot. P2022TKY7B to Silvia Benavides Varela and Lucia Regolin P2022TKY7B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn chicks can solve complex numerical discriminations through a purely perceptual mechanism based on the possibility of creating all equal-sized subsets. The present work investigates whether this is a prerogative of precocial birds or whether an analogous mechanism can be found in humans. We familiarized 8-month-olds with sets of even numerosities (i.e., decomposable in equal-sized subsets), and then we tested them for their spontaneous preference between two novel sets, one that cannot be divided into equal-sized subsets (i.e., a prime numerosity) and one decomposable in equal-sized subsets (i.e., a non-prime odd numerosity). Infants were tested with either the 7vs.9 comparison (i.e., the prime being smaller) or the 9vs.11 comparison (i.e., the prime being larger). Infants oriented their gaze more often toward the prime set of elements, irrespective of whether it was smaller or larger in the comparison, similar to the preference observed in baby chicks. Overall, our results suggest an early-emerging perceptual mechanism that can support complex numerical discriminations, that might be shared between distantly related and ecologically different species.

Indexed as

Visual PerceptionFemaleHumansInfantMaleAnalogous mechanismsComparative PsychologyEarly predispositionsInfantsNumerical discriminationPerceptual grouping

Identifiers

PMID39934171
PMCPMC11814068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.