ArticleInternational journal of dermatology2025
Assessing the Health Implications of UV/LED Nail Lamp Radiation Exposure During Manicure and Pedicure Procedures: A Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Chemistry of Behind the UV-Curable Nail Polishes.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin malignancies associated with radiation exposure, notably malignant melanoma and keratinocyte carcinoma, are emerging as a significant global health challenge. While indoor tanning beds are associated with skin cancer risk, limited research exists on ultraviolet (UV)/light-emitting diode (LED) nail lamps used widely in manicures/pedicures. This scoping review aimed to synthesize evidence on the health effects of UV/LED nail lamp exposure during manicures/pedicures. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL identified 17 articles, including 12 studies and 5 case reports meeting eligibility criteria published in English from inception to January 2024. Several studies characterized emitted spectra and measured irradiances from commercial lamps, finding predominantly UVA emissions that complied with safety guidelines when correctly used. However, higher exposures exceeding safety limits were also observed. In vitro evidence demonstrated that UV nail lamps potentially induce DNA damage consistent with carcinogenesis. Case reports described squamous cell carcinoma and actinic keratosis restricted to the hands of patients with histories of extensive UV nail lamp exposure. While studies suggested that the cancer risks from typical use are acceptably low, there is room for improvement. Measurements have shown that the doses of UV emission vary across different lamps yet remain low. Surveys have revealed a need for more consumer awareness regarding these risks. Current evidence is insufficient to support the mandatory implementation of protective measures such as gloves or sunscreen during UV nail lamp exposure. More importantly, a direct causal link between UV nail lamps and carcinoma development has not been conclusively established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.