SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2025
Targeting the Infrapatellar Branch of the Saphenous Nerve for Pain Relief in Patients With Acute or Chronic Knee Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies.
Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blocking the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) can provide analgesic benefits for patients with postoperative acute pain or chronic pain, with minimal adverse effects. To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and potential adverse events associated with IPBSN block in patients suffering from acute or chronic knee pain. We conducted a systematic review across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies according to predefined selection criteria. The study quality of the RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, while cohort studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I risk of bias tool. The primary outcomes measured were pain intensity and opioid consumption following the nerve block. A total of eight studies were included in this systematic review, encompassing 613 subjects with 276 participants in the control group and 337 participants in the IPBSN block group. The level of evidence was rated high for the RCTs and moderate for the cohort studies. The nerve block was administrated either through the injection of local anesthetic or percutaneous cryoneurolysis targeting the IPBSN. The results indicated that the IPBSN block significantly improved pain relief and reduced opioid consumption in patients with acute postoperative or chronic pain, with no significant difference in the rate of adverse events relating to the procedures or device. The IPBSN block holds promise for improving pain relief and reducing opioid consumption. However, further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.