Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934059›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of surgical research2025

Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Surgery: Ethical Implications and Transformative Potential.

Jamie R Robinson, Anne Stey, David F Schneider, Anai N Kothari, Brenessa Lindeman, Haytham M Kaafarani, Krista L Haines

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of surgical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Use of Ambient Dictation Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Spaces in Surgery: A Scoping Review.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jamie R RobinsonDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt Doctors' Office Tower, Nashville, Tennessee; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address: jamie.robinson@vumc.org.
Anne SteyDepartment of Surgery, Center of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Feinberg School of Medicine, Institute of Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
David F SchneiderDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Anai N KothariDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Brenessa LindemanDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Haytham M KaafaraniDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Krista L HainesDivision of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

Timeliness of Management of Trauma Related Hemorrhage and Trauma Related CoagulopathyK23HL157832 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI STEY, ANNE M · 2021 to 2025
$929k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS029483NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL157832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being used in medicine due to its advanced capabilities in image and video recognition, clinical decision support, surgical education, and administrative task automation. Large language models such as OpenAI's Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT)-4 and Google's Bard have particularly revolutionized text generation, offering substantial benefits for the academic surgeon, including aiding in manuscript and grant writing. However, integrating AI into academic surgery necessitates addressing ethical concerns such as bias, transparency, and intellectual property. This paper provides guidelines and recommendations based on current literature around the opportunities and ethical challenges of AI in academic surgery. We discuss the underlying mechanisms of large language models, their potential biases, and the importance of responsible usage. Furthermore, we explore the ethical implications of AI in clinical documentation, highlighting improved efficiency and necessary privacy concerns. This review also addresses the critical issue of intellectual property dilemmas posed by AI-generated innovations in university settings. Finally, we propose guidelines for the responsible adoption of AI in academic and clinical environments, stressing the need for transparency, ethical training, and robust governance frameworks to ensure AI enhances, rather than undermines, academic integrity and patient care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGeneral SurgeryGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansIntellectual PropertyAIArtificial intelligenceChatGPTGenerative AILarge language models

Identifiers

PMID39934059
PMCPMC13160375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.