Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39934056›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2025

Clutter-Generating Phantom Material. Part II: Utilization in the Comparison of Conventional and Regularized Ultrasound Attenuation Estimation.

Hayley M Whitson, Ivan M Rosado-Mendez, Timothy J Hall

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hayley M WhitsonDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Ivan M Rosado-MendezDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Timothy J HallDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: tjhall@wisc.edu.

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
U.W. RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bryan Patrick Bednarz · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
Monitoring Changes in Cervical Microstructure During PregnancyR01HD072077 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FELTOVICH, HELEN, HALL, TIMOTHY J · 2013 to 2022
$6.1M
EASI: Shear Wave Elastography Assessment For Predicting Success Of Labor InductionR01HD096361 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FELTOVICH, HELEN, GROBMAN, WILLIAM ADAM · 2018 to 2020
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009206NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072077NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD096361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A particular challenge in clinical ultrasound imaging is acoustic clutter, which arises from the heterogeneity of the speed of sound and reverberations between layered tissue types. Although clutter is common when imaging through complex tissue such as the abdominal wall, few studies have investigated its effects on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameter estimation. The ultrasonic attenuation coefficient (AC) has shown promise as a biomarker for multiple applications. Recently, multiple regularized methods of AC estimation have been developed; however, their performance must be evaluated in clinically relevant scenarios such as in the presence of clutter. In a companion paper to this work, a material that produces clutter similar to that seen in clinical imaging was developed and characterized. Here, we utilize this clutter-generating phantom material to compare the bias and variance of AC estimates resulting from a conventional estimation method known as the spectral difference method (SDM) and a regularized method known as Analytical Global Regularized Backscatter Quantitative Ultrasound (ALGEBRA), which can either be implemented in 1D or 2D. A B-mode, target-based contrast-to-noise ratio was used to quantify the amount of clutter in data collected from a phantom with known AC. Estimation reliability was determined using the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and the percent bias. On average, 1D-ALGEBRA had a 22.86% smaller bias and a 32.19% smaller NRMSE than the SDM, while 2D-ALGEBRA had a 17.59% smaller bias and a 25.66% smaller NRMSE than the SDM. An analysis of variance model indicated that ALGEBRA is more robust to the presence of clutter than the SDM. Further statistical tests showed that the reduction in variance resulting from ALGEBRA was the main contributor to the reduction in NRMSE. This work demonstrates the utility of this clutter-generating phantom material in objective testing of QUS parameter estimation, as well as performance improvements obtained in phantoms with regularized methods from QUS parameter estimation in the presence of acoustic clutter.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingHumansUltrasonographyClutterRegularized methodsUltrasonic attenuationUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39934056
PMCPMC12008997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.