ArticleBMJ open2025
Gender disparity in living organ donation: a qualitative analysis of experiences and perceptions of female donors in Pakistan.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Promoting deceased organ donation: should familist incentives be adopted in Islamic regions?Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2026Article
- Exploring civilian minds and lives during the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict: a phenomenological study in Lahore, Pakistan.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Barriers to Renal Transplant in Pakistan.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to explore and analyse the interplay of sociocultural, psychological and institutional factors, gender roles and power dynamics in shaping the decision-making processes and experiences of living kidney and liver donors in Punjab, specifically focusing on women.
designThis study employed a qualitative approach, using in-depth interviews to delve into the narratives and experiences of living kidney and liver donors in Punjab.
settingPunjab Human Organ Transplantation Authority (PHOTA), Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
participants17 participants registered at the PHOTA for kidney or liver donation.
resultsInterviews with living donors at PHOTA, Lahore, provided qualitative data, which was then systematically coded and analysed to identify recurring themes that explore the underlying social and cultural reasons for the observed gender disparity. The qualitative research yielded 17 interviews to include in the analysis, representing the voices of living kidney and liver donors. The study resulted in the following themes emerging: (1) female donation as a consequence of economic vulnerability; (2) comorbidities impacting donor eligibility; (3) altruism among female donors; (4) social and self-benefit of the donors and (5) social obligation on the female donors. These themes transcended the medical considerations and highlighted the interplay between social norms, family dynamics and gendered expectations surrounding caregiving and self-sacrifice.
conclusionThe findings of this study underscore the significant relationship between gender roles, economic pressures and social expectations in the context of living organ donation. The study's results highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions to address the gender gap in living kidney and liver donation. By acknowledging the influence of social and economic factors, strategies to create a more equitable landscape for living kidney and liver donors can be created.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.