Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39933794›Full record

Observational studyRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2025

A Two-Staged, Risk-Stratified Strategy Combining FEV

Po-Chun Lo, Hsin-Kuo Ko, Kun-Ta Chou, Yi-Han Hsiao, Diahn-Warng Perng, Kang-Cheng Su

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic performance of FEVChronic respiratory disease
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Po-Chun LoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Taoyuan General Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0009-0009-9576-9739
Hsin-Kuo KoDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Kun-Ta ChouDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0002-4822-5474
Yi-Han HsiaoDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Diahn-Warng PerngDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Kang-Cheng SuDepartment of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID 0000-0002-9111-5182

Funding

National Science and Technology Council NSTC 113-2314-B-075-043-Taipei Veterans General Hospital V107C-112Taipei Veterans General Hospital V109C-100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveSymptom-based questionnaires and handheld lung function devices are widely used for COPD case finding, but the optimal combination remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy (DA) of various combinations of handheld lung function devices and questionnaires and develop a COPD case-finding strategy.

methodsThis cross-sectional, prospective, observational study enrolled participants aged ≥ 40 years with respiratory symptoms and ≥ 10 smoking pack-years. Participants completed three questionnaires (COPD diagnostic questionnaire [CDQ], lung function questionnaire; COPD Population Screener) and 2 handheld lung function devices (peak flow meter, microspirometer), followed by spirometry to confirm COPD (post-bronchodilation FEV

resultsAmong 224 participants, COPD incidence was 29%. Individually, handheld devices showed significantly higher DA than questionnaires (AUROC 0.678-0.69 for questionnaires vs. 0.807 for peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR] and 0.888 for FEV

conclusionFEV

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRespiratory Function TestsRisk AssessmentSpirometrySurveys and Questionnairescombined modalitydiagnostic accuracyFEV1/FEV6handheld lung function devicepeak expiratory flow ratepredictive performancesymptom‐based questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID39933794
PMCPMC12128744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.