Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39933781›Full record

ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2025

Changes in faecal haemoglobin values over sequential rounds of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) in a surveillance population.

Gemma Mortell, Kate Wooldrage, Gwen A Murphy, Amanda J Cross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gemma MortellDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London - St Mary's Campus, London, UK g.mortell@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7594-1153
Kate WooldrageDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London - St Mary's Campus, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8209-3113
Gwen A MurphyDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London - St Mary's Campus, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0118-5337
Amanda J CrossDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London - St Mary's Campus, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0893-2377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveColorectal cancer (CRC) screening enables resection of polyp precursor lesions, preventing cancer or detecting it earlier. Post-polypectomy, people can remain at increased CRC risk, prompting surveillance colonoscopy. Less invasive faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) could reduce the burden of surveillance colonoscopy. We investigated whether changes in FIT values over multiple rounds were associated with advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) detection.

methodsA cohort of men and women aged 60-72 years deemed intermediate risk by the 2002 UK adenoma surveillance guidelines and scheduled for three yearly colonoscopies were recruited (January 2012-December 2013) within the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme and offered a quantitative FIT at 1, 2 and 3 years post-baseline colonoscopy for a prospective analysis within a diagnostic accuracy study. Participants positive (≥40 µg haemoglobin/g faeces) at 1 year or 2 years were offered early colonoscopy and excluded, otherwise, colonoscopy was offered at 3 years. Only those who completed three FIT rounds and attended the 3-year colonoscopy were included. Participants were grouped based on changes between FIT rounds, with changes defined as absolute differences ≥4 µg/g, and positivity at round 3.

resultsAmong 4412 participants, the largest group (n=2773) was the no change category, which had the lowest ACN detection rate (4.7%, 95% CI: 3.9 to 5.5). The serial increase group with a positive round 3 value (n=46) had the highest ACN detection rate (32.6%, 95% CI: 19.5 to 48.0).

conclusionNo change in FIT result across multiple rounds was associated with a low ACN detection rate, while a serial increase was associated with higher ACN detection rates. Further research should consider if sequential rounds of FIT could be used for stratifying individual risk.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFecesHemoglobinsOccult BloodAgedColonoscopyFemaleHumansImmunochemistryMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceProspective StudiesHemoglobinsCANCER EPIDEMIOLOGYCOLORECTAL ADENOMASCOLORECTAL CANCERCOLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

Identifiers

PMID39933781
PMCPMC11843008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.