Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39933521›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025

A systems model of alternating theta sweeps via firing rate adaptation.

Zilong Ji, Tianhao Chu, Si Wu, Neil Burgess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Navigation: Scanning your future path.Current biology : CB · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zilong JiUCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AZ, UK; UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Center of Quantitative Biology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.
Tianhao ChuSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Center of Quantitative Biology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China.
Si WuSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Center of Quantitative Biology, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, China. Electronic address: siwu@pku.edu.cn.
Neil BurgessUCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AZ, UK; UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Electronic address: n.burgess@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Place and grid cells provide a neural system for self-location and tend to fire in sequences within each cycle of the hippocampal theta rhythm when rodents run on a linear track. These sequences correspond to the decoded location of the animal sweeping forward from its current location ("theta sweeps"). However, recent findings in open-field environments show alternating left-right theta sweeps and propose a circuit for their generation. Here, we present a computational model of this circuit, comprising theta-modulated head-direction cells, conjunctive grid × direction cells, and pure grid cells, based on continuous attractor dynamics, firing rate adaptation, and modulation by the medial-septal theta rhythm. Due to firing rate adaptation, the head-direction ring attractor exhibits left-right sweeps coding for internal direction, providing an input to the grid cell attractor network shifted along the internal direction, via an intermediate layer of conjunctive grid × direction cells, producing left-right sweeps of position by grid cells. Our model explains the empirical findings, including the alignment of internal position and direction sweeps and the dependence of sweep length on grid spacing. It makes predictions for theta-modulated head-direction cells, including relationships between theta phase precession during turning, theta skipping, anticipatory firing, and directional tuning width, several of which we verify in experimental data from anteroventral thalamus. The model also predicts relationships between position and direction sweeps, running speed, and dorsal-ventral location within the entorhinal cortex. Overall, a simple intrinsic mechanism explains the complex theta dynamics of an internal direction signal within the hippocampal formation, with testable predictions.

Indexed as

Grid CellsHippocampusModels, NeurologicalPlace CellsTheta RhythmAction PotentialsAnimalsComputer SimulationRats

Identifiers

PMID39933521
PMCPMC7619080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.