ArticleOncology nursing forum2024
Environmental Enrichment After Primary Glioma Radiation Therapy.
Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Importance of radiation-related cognitive decline in older adults who receive cranial radiation.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2025Review
- Environmental Enrichment and Health Outcomes Among Low-Grade Glioma Brain Tumor Survivors.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo explore and describe the health outcomes and levels of environmental enrichment (EE) in participants with brain tumors after radiation therapy (RT). SAMPLE &
setting39 participants with glioma (grades 2-3) treated with RT were recruited within five years of original diagnosis from a neuro-oncology clinic. METHODS & VARIABLES: A cross-sectional design was employed. EE measures included social connectedness, physical activity, employment, and financial stability. Health outcome measures included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, global cortical atrophy rate scale, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale, and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor Module. Descriptive statistics characterized the health outcomes between participants who received photon RT and proton beam RT.
resultsParticipants who received photon RT with high EE showed higher scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, and Karnofsky Performance Status Scale, and lower scores on the global cortical atrophy rate scale and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor Module. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: EE may reduce symptom burden, promote healthy brain aging, and improve cognitive and functional status in glioma survivors receiving photon RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.