Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39933080›Full record

ReviewClinical journal of oncology nursing2025

Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.

Lucie Minot, Vincent Javaugue, Marlène Arbutina, Sheik Emambux

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucie MinotLucie Minot.
Vincent JavaugueVincent Javaugue.
Marlène ArbutinaMarlène Arbutina.
Sheik EmambuxSheik Emambux.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe variety of therapeutic associations in first-line treatment of advanced and metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) illustrates the complexity of toxicity management that can affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Electronic monitoring applications have become part of the daily practice of providers in following up with people with cancer.

objectivesThis article offers perspectives for electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in clinical practice to enhance symptom management and HRQOL for patients with mRCC.

methodsA narrative review combines the results of searches conducted on MEDLINE®, Embase®, and Cochrane Library for articles that identify therapeutic combinations used in treating mRCC, extract HRQOL data, and evaluate the benefits of ePROMs.

findingsePROMs can be adapted to the toxicity and symptom specificities encountered in patients with mRCC undergoing front-line treatment. Combined with multidimensional HRQOL indicators, these tools can improve symptom management and provide early support adapted to the patient's needs.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Metastasishealth-related quality of lifepatient-reported outcomesrenal cell carcinomatechnology

Identifiers

PMID39933080
PMCPMC12056818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.