ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2025
Markov State Models with Weighted Ensemble Simulation: How to Eliminate the Trajectory Merging Bias.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Stability of Molecular Glues with Weighted Ensemble Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Elucidating the Structure and Activation Mechanisms of GPCRs Using Modern Computational and AI Tools.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Conformation Driven Enhancement of Neurolysin Activity in Presence of a Small Molecule Activator.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Unlocking the undruggable spliceosome: generative AI and structural dynamics in cancer therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The weighted ensemble (WE) algorithm is gaining popularity as a rare event method for studying long timescale processes with molecular dynamics. WE is particularly useful for determining kinetic properties, such as rates of protein (un)folding and ligand (un)binding, where transition rates can be calculated from the flux of trajectories into a target basin of interest. However, this flux depends exponentially on the number of splitting events that a given trajectory experiences before reaching the target state and can vary by orders of magnitude between WE replicates. Markov state models (MSMs) are helpful tools to aggregate information across multiple WE simulations and have previously been shown to provide more accurate transition rates than WE alone. Discrete-time MSMs are models that coarsely describe the evolution of the system from one discrete state to the next using a discrete lag time, τ. When an MSM is built using conventional MD data, longer values of τ typically provide more accurate results. Combining WE simulations with Markov state modeling presents some additional challenges, especially when using a value of τ that exceeds the lag time between resampling steps in the WE algorithm, τ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.