Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39933001›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Flake production: A universal by-product of primate stone percussion.

Tomos Proffitt, Paula de Sousa Medeiros, Waldney Pereira Martins, Lydia V Luncz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Flake production: A universal by-product of primate stone percussion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomos ProffittTechnological Primates Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1428-2013
Paula de Sousa MedeirosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Uso dos Recursos Naturais, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, MG 39401-089, Brazil.
Waldney Pereira MartinsPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Uso dos Recursos Naturais, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, MG 39401-089, Brazil.
Lydia V LunczTechnological Primates Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of stone tool technology marks a significant milestone in hominin development, enabling early humans to manipulate their environments. The oldest known evidence, dating to 3.3 Ma, indicates a combination of percussive and flake production activities. Studying the archaeological signature of percussive stone tool use in living primate provides a potential analog to the origin of stone flake technology in the hominin lineage. Here, we present a yellow-breasted capuchin (

Indexed as

SapajusTool Use BehaviorAnimalsArchaeologyBiological EvolutionBrazilFossilsHominidaeHumansPrimatescapuchinoldowanprimate archaeologySapajus xanthosternostechnology

Identifiers

PMID39933001
PMCPMC11848292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.