Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39932978›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Facilitating safe transition to home for preterm infants (FAST home): Protocol for a retrospective observational study.

Lisa Szatkowski, Janine Abramson, Sha Tao, Sarah E Seaton, Jon Dorling, Michelle Arellano-Meza, Jane Harvey, Tom Harvey, Shalini Ojha

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06284044 (Facilitating Safe Transition to Home for Preterm Infants - a Retrospective Observational Study Using a National Database), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06284044 completednot on this map

Facilitating Safe Transition to Home for Preterm Infants - a Retrospective Observational Study Using a National Database

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation TrustRan2023 to 2025Enrolled250,000ConditionsPremature Birth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisa SzatkowskiCentre for Perinatal Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3295-5891
Janine AbramsonCentre for Perinatal Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6558-0163
Sha TaoCentre for Perinatal Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sarah E SeatonDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Jon DorlingNeonatal Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Michelle Arellano-MezaParent Collaborator, United Kingdom.
Jane HarveyParent Collaborator, United Kingdom.
Tom HarveyParent Collaborator, United Kingdom.
Shalini OjhaCentre for Perinatal Research, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreterm infants (i.e., those born before 37 completed weeks of pregnancy) often require additional care and are admitted to neonatal units soon after birth. Readiness for discharge home typically requires a level of physiological maturity such that an infant is able to: 1) breathe spontaneously without additional support; 2) maintain their own body temperature; 3) take all their nutritional requirements orally; 4) weighs ≥ 1700g and is gaining weight. Longer hospital stays than necessary can be detrimental to infants, stressful for families, and costly. Currently, little is known about whether, how long and why preterm infants stay in hospital beyond physiological readiness for discharge. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe will conduct a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Neonatal Research Database on all infants born at < 37 weeks' gestational age (GA) admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales from 2016-2022. The day of life and postmenstrual age infants reach each physiological milestone, and the final barrier to discharge, will be identified. We will assess whether the final barrier differs by GA and between neonatal Operational Delivery Networks and summarise the number of days infants remain in hospital after surpassing all physiological milestones. We will explore the characteristics of infants, mothers and neonatal units associated with extended hospital stays beyond physiological readiness for discharge. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will allow identification of areas to target to help achieve a safe reduction in length of hospital stay and will support the development of evidence-based recommendations to guide optimal discharge practices.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06284044.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematurePatient DischargeEnglandFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayMaleObservational Studies as TopicRetrospective StudiesWales

Identifiers

PMID39932978
PMCPMC11813073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.